Teachers’ Perception of Peer Assessment Technique of Secondary School Students’ Learning in Christian Religious Studies in Delta State
Main Article Content
Abstract
Peer assessment is a collaborative process where students evaluate each other’s work and a valuable tool for both learning and growth. Teachers often lean towards teacher assessment, relying on their own evaluations. Teacher-made tests are commonly employed for teaching and learning of CRS. This assessment method though serves as a significant tool in assessing students’ understanding and progress requires some other approaches such as peer assessment technique. The study examined teachers’ perception of the peer assessment technique of secondary school students’ learning in Christian Religious Studies (CRS) in Aniocha South LGA of Delta State. The study adopted non-experimenatl design of survey research. The population of the study comprised 34 CRS teachers. A sample of 27 teachers was drawn from the population. The study was conducted in 17 privately owned secondary schools in Aniocha South LGA selected through simple random sampling technique. A questionnaire titled “Teachers’ Perception and Peer Assessment Technique Questionnaire” (TPPATQ) was used to obtain relevant information from 27 respondents selected from the CRS teachers of the privately-owned secondary schools. Three research questions guided the study. The data collected were analysed using mean and presented in tables. The result of the study showed that peer assessment was perceived by teachers as a technique that encourages classroom learning activities, student-to-student assessment, and student-teacher feedback. Peer assessment improves the learning of CRS. The study recommends that teachers adopt peer assessment in classroom learning activities in CRS.
Article Details
References
Black, P. & William, D. (2003). Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
Burgwald, J. (2021). The effects of student constructed formative assessment in the elementary classroom. https://sophia.stkate.edu.
Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, CELT (2022). Formative feedback. https://www.celt.iastate.edu/tag/formative
Double, K.S., McGrane, J. A. & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481-509. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Eluu, P.E., & Ikwumelu, S.N. (2014). Effective teaching of christian religious knowledge at the senior secondary school level for curbing insurgency in Nigeria: Some impediments. The Intuition, 6(1) 1-8. https://www.globalacademicgroup.com
Gafoor, K.A. (2013). Types and phases of evaluation in educational practice https://www.researchgate.net
Kizlik, B. (2014). Measurement, assessment, and evaluation in education. https://www.cloud.edu
Lan, L. & Fei, G. (2015). Effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Visual Communication and Technology Education Faculty Publications. 33. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234762636.pdf
Main, P. (2021). Formative assessment strategies: A teacher’s guide. www.structural-learning.com
Njoku N.C. & Njoku D.I., (2015). Challenges and implementation of christian religious studies curriculum: A study of secondary school pupils in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18) 176 – 180. www.iiste.org
New South Wales department of Education (2022). Peer and self-assessment for students https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-and-learning/professional-learning/teacher-quality-and-accreditation/strong-sta
Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2012). Peer and self-assessment. In Instructional guide for university faculty and teaching assistants. https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/instructional-guide
Ozan, C., & Kincal, R.Y. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 85–118. https://files.eric.ed.gov
Seifert, K. & Sutton, R. (2021). Teacher-made assessment strategies. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Under_Construction/Purgatory/Book%3A_Instructional_Methods_Strategies_
Shengkai, Y., Fang, C. & Hui, C. (2022). Assessment as learning: How does peer assessment function in students' learning? Educational Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912568
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge, Abingdon.
Van Gennip, N.A.E., Segers, M., & Tillema, H.H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54.
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7) 1032-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698
William, D. (2016). The secret of effective feedback. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 73(7). https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-secret-of-effective-feedback
Using Student-to-Student Peer Assessment (n.d.). https://www.celt.iastate.edu/instructional-strategies/evaluating-teaching/peer-assessment/